Admiralty and Maritime Legal Counsel Admiralty and Maritime Legal Counsel
Admiralty and Maritime Legal Counsel
Fulweiler LLC Attorneys at Law Firm Overview Firm Staff Firm Philosophy Contact Us
Do You Need Help? Why Fulweiler llc is the right choice Get instantly Connected to our Firm
Admiralty and Maritime Pratice Areas
Maritime Injury & Death Claims
RI Boat Injury Lawyer
Rhode Island Maritime Lawyer
Admiralty & Maritime Matters
Wind Turbine Litigation & Support
Recreational Boating Claims
Longshoremen & Dock Worker Injuries
Crewmember Injuries
Cruise Line Injuries
Yacht Warranty & Defect Claims
Claims Against Insurers & Surveyors
Marine Salvage & Towing Claims
Contact our firm today
Our address: 150 Airport Street, Second Floor, Quonset Point, RI 02852

New Legislation Might Help Maritime Claimants

New Legislation Might Help Maritime Claimants

Everyone likes harmony whether it's Kansas belting out Carry on my Wayward Son or the simple no-drama setting of shipboard unity. Sadly, the sweet harmony of similar sound isn't something you find in the maritime law. Take for example, the 1851 Limitation of Liability Act which upends the maritime claimant creating an ugly sound and unfair outcomes.

We're told the Limitation of Liability Act was intended to foster investment in shipping. The law protects vessel owners (and a limited class of owner-like interests) by allowing owners to invoke bankruptcy-like protections. After a loss, the vessel owner brings a lawsuit raising the Act's protections. Once triggered, the Act requires all claimants file a claim in a specific court within a short period of time and if the owner ultimately shows they didn't have any 'knowledge or privity' of the negligence causing the loss, the owner's liability is limited to the dollar amount of the vessel after the loss – usually not much.

This Act is a ship-show. It has the effect of shortening statutes of limitation requiring claimants who might still be medically treating file and prove their claim in federal court within months of the loss. It's used by vessel interests to drag claimants into a courtroom they didn't choose. In many instances, it strips claimants of a right to a jury trial in state court. And collaterally because of the expensive burden of complying with the federal rules, it removes value from a claimant's recovery. Worse, and despite insurance being purchased for this very reason, courts (incredibly) don't allow insurance policies to be added to the pot along with the post-casualty vessel value.

The Act's raw unfairness was spotlighted following thirty-four people dying in an inferno aboard a dive boat off California in 2019. A new bill (H.R. 5329) proposes legislation intended to extinguish these unfair outcomes. The bill is its infancy so specifics are missing, but it's a good sign. I hope to see changes not only to the financial compensation aspect, but the process as well. Heck and in truth, I say forget a new bill, sink the darn thing.

Still, maybe like how Mutt Lange's deft touch with groups like AC/DC and Def Leppard worked magic, there's hope for a harmony where injured maritime claimants get a shot at real relief instead the clang of a cowbell.

Underway and making way.

-- John K. Fulweiler, Esq.

Fulweiler llc, WB Franklin Bakery Building, 40 Mary St., Newport, RI 02840 / 1-800-383-MAYDAY (6293)

Know Your Rights!

We Wrote the Book on Maritime
Personal Injury Law

Click here to recieve your FREE copy today.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter here